Introduction
With the rapid growth in global energy needs, wind turbines have emerged as a reliable solution to face the problem of climate and ecological changes. Direct-drive permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) used in wind turbines have received significant attention thanks to the elimination of gearbox noise and their low maintenance cost. PMSMs provide high energy efficiency and a better permanent magnet yield. In addition, the absence of a circuit exciter reduces the maintenance cost of the generator’s rotor and minimizes its losses, which helps achieve better thermal effectiveness and higher performance.
Machines Used for Energy Conversion of Wind Systems
The most popular wind generators currently used in wind conversion chains are asynchronous generators (such as squirrel cage generators, and double-fed asynchronous generators) and permanent magnet synchronous generators. How to choose the right machine for your wind turbine conversion chain?
Squirrel Cage Induction Generators (SCIGs)
SCIGs operate at a fixed speed. They are standardized and have a low maintenance cost thanks to the use of a simple electrical interface and the elimination of power electronics. They are used for high power wind turbines (above 100KW). High speed wind turbines use gearbox which affects their mass. Besides, the energy captured is not optimal because the speed is not controllable, and its range of variation is limited. The concept of fixed speed inspired wind turbine manufacturers to use alternative types of machines adequate for the variable speed such as doubly-fed induction generators (DFIGs) and permanent magnet generators (PMSGs).
Doubly-Fed Induction Generators (DFIGs)
The DFIGs have the same operating principle of the SCIGs with a wound rotor instead of squirrel cage rotor. They are innovative compared to SCIGs working with variable speed. However, the design of the DFIGs is a complex task due to the presence of brush-ring assembly and the mechanical speed multiplier. They demand regular maintenance. In addition, their connection with the network requires power electronic interface and converters which are expensive, sensitive to over-current, and present complex control strategies during the network disturbances. To overcome the drawbacks of DFIGs, wind turbine designers used PMSGs.
Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators (PMSGs)
The PMSGs operate at a variable speed with reduced cost and volume. They can be used directly or via mechanical gearbox. The absence of the gearbox eliminates noise problems and reduce maintenance costs. The use of the permanent magnets (PMs) provides a strong magnetic field in the air gap. In fact, the absence of the excitation circuit at the level of the rotor minimizes the losses by Joule effect which improves the energy efficiency of the generator. The brush-ring assembly is eliminated, and the design of the machine becomes simpler especially for the rotor thanks to the PMs. PMSGs with a large number of poles provide considerable mechanical torques. They use power electronics interfaces, which make them economically viable and real competitors to DFIGs. The major downside of this type of machine is the high cost of PMs.
Popular Topologies of PMSGs
The topologies of PMSGs are determined by the types of flux, rotor, and permanent magnet.
Flux Types:
There are two types of PMSGs which are axial flux and radial flux generators.
Rotor Types:
Permanent Magnet Types:
Analytical Modelling of a Surface PMSG with Internal Rotor
Generator Specifications | Value |
Rated power (W) | 1100 |
Rated angular speed (rpm) | 382 |
Pole pairs number | 6 |
Stator yoke induction (T) | 1.4 |
Slot number per pole per phase | 1 |
Current surface density (A.mm2) | 2.7 |
- Bore radius
- Machine length
- Air gap thickness
- Slot width
- Magnet Angular Width per pole
- Magnet thickness
- Stator yoke thickness
- Induced flux
- Back EMF
- Induced current
Geometric Parameters | Dimension (mm) |
Bore radius | 83.16 |
Air gap | 1.18 |
Magnet thickness | 4.49 |
Active length of the machine | 41.07 |
Slot width | 9.68 |
Stator yoke thickness | 11.29 |
Rotor yoke thickness | 11.29 |
Magnet width for one pole | 36.28 |
Tooth width | 9.68 |
Slot depth | 30.44 |
Electromagnetic parameters | Value |
Maximum vacuum flux (Wb) | 0.34 |
Maximum vacuum induced EMF (V) | 82.5 |
Magnetic flux density in the air gap (T) | 0.85 |
Results & Discussion
EMWorks2D Validation of the Reference PMSG
Using the virtual prototyping software EMWorks2D, we designed the indicated machine. Then, we moved to the electromagnetic analysis to determine the following parameters:
- Magnetic flux density in the air gap
- Field lines and the magnetic flux density in the machine
- Induced flux
- Back EMF
- Cogging torque